|
|
|
|
|
by XorNot
1884 days ago
|
|
And that argument is complete junk: https://i.imgur.com/QpvGlnV.gif The money I spend of my income buying goods from other businesses is "already taxed" and then when those businesses collect it from me its "taxed again". Mysteriously, the one form of taxation the already wealthy benefit from is very concerned about this happening. |
|
A little bit like a VAT, we don't want to tax, tax and tax some product that has a long and complicated line of distributors, rather, tax the final product, either using VAT rebates etc.. This is more economically beneficial.
With corporate and individual incomes, we think at little bit the same way - i.e. how the taxation will flow through via corp tax, income tax, dividend tax and cap gains.
In Ontario, if you pay small business corp tax and then a dividend, it's pretty much the same as if you were to take a salary and pay income tax. Obviously, this because the million or so small businesses out there would rig their outgoing cash flows one way or the other, depending on tax treatment.
While cap gains is a special situation, it does still form part of those block of taxes that should naturally relate to one another in terms of how net surpluses are taxed.
When you spend your 'already taxed income' on an entirely new product or service, then that's separate economic activity, and so it's taxed without consideration to your 'previously taxed income'.