Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sbierwagen 5475 days ago
Really?

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2...

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2...

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Funitinu.net%2...

Dang, apparently so. Guess I was wrong.

The world's most inane objection: If you force the validator to HTML5 mode, (as in the first and second links) then you don't need to declare a DOCTYPE, a savings of 16 bytes. Not that you would ever do that for a real document, since it's a dumb idea.

1 comments

forcing the validator to HTML5 mode would imply the doctype, wouldn't it, as the only way to force a browser to HTML5 mode is to include a doctype.