|
|
|
|
|
|
by piva00
1885 days ago
|
|
|
With this type of argument you attack one of the central tenets of human rights where every human life, no matter what, is worth the same. The moment you define that there are certain crimes where a human life is not the same as other human lives, no matter the reason, you move away from this core tenet. It's all a matter if you believe in that core piece of universal human rights or not. |
|
|
You have to define who made up this right. Not everyone will agree. Most people will have boundaries on that no matter what all human lives are the same. Killing someone else on purpose breaks that boundary.