Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by brendoelfrendo 1891 days ago
It's not eye opening at all. The evidence that exonerated Smith was a confession from another individual accompanied by physical evidence of that individual at the scene of the crime. Much more compelling than Smith's "uh huh." The comment you're replying to is being deceitful.
1 comments

OP is cherry-picking one piece out of the story. Getting karma for it, but in a most sleazy way possible.