|
|
|
|
|
by stefan_
1892 days ago
|
|
> Ms. Haddaway had demanded that the state dismiss unrelated drug charges against her grandson in exchange for her testimony against Mr. Smith and Mr. Faulkner. The recordings also show that the state refused to place that deal in writing to prevent Ms. Haddaway from being cross-examined on the issue. The state, in fact, dismissed the charges three days before Mr. Andrews’s trial was scheduled to begin. So they didn't just withhold information, 13 years after they manufactured a witness with some quid pro quo? I think there was a crime committed here. |
|