Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stefan_ 1892 days ago
> Ms. Haddaway had demanded that the state dismiss unrelated drug charges against her grandson in exchange for her testimony against Mr. Smith and Mr. Faulkner. The recordings also show that the state refused to place that deal in writing to prevent Ms. Haddaway from being cross-examined on the issue. The state, in fact, dismissed the charges three days before Mr. Andrews’s trial was scheduled to begin.

So they didn't just withhold information, 13 years after they manufactured a witness with some quid pro quo?

I think there was a crime committed here.

3 comments

The story behind a lot of these innocence project stories is one of corruption and/or incompetence. We don’t punish those things too hard in the US unless the target is poor or brown.
For those not fluent in Latin (I had to look up) "quid pro quo" means "a favour or advantage granted in return for something".
JFYI, it is only the English/American that use quid pro quo in that sense, in Latin (like in many other languages) it has a different meaning, while do ut des has that meaning:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quid_pro_quo

"The Latin phrase corresponding to the usage of quid pro quo in English is do ut des (Latin for "I give, so that you may give"). Other languages continue to use do ut des for this purpose, while quid pro quo (or its equivalent qui pro quo, as widely used in Italian, French and Spanish) still keeps its original meaning of something being unwillingly mistaken, or erroneously told or understood, instead of something else."

I think all Americans know what "quid pro quo" is. A President was impeached for that. It was most likely the impeachment of the century.
You are overestimating the average Americans. I can assure you 90% wouldn't know what it is if you ask them.

Trying is free, ask your friends tomorrow and share the results here please.

Many Americans have heard of it and know that Trump was accused of it, but might not know what it means. And not everyone on this site is American.
The literal meaning is "what for what?".
Not really. quid/quod can mean `what' or `something'. Here it clearly means `something'.
So kind of like a "something for something" ?
And yet, it's still an Alford plea. He gets out, but no compensation or exoneration unless he leads the effort to clear himself.