|
|
|
|
|
by pyjug
1882 days ago
|
|
>psychologically safe in a world with climate change, cancer, random attacks of violence, earthquakes, etc? Obviously, "total" in this context means in the workplace. Also, psychological safety essentially means "ability to express yourself and make mistakes without the fear of negative consequences" - it has nothing to do with shielding yourself from cancer, climate change etc. Ironically, the Buddha, who was quoted in the OP grew up with "total psychological safety" as you defined it, and you know where that led him. > just like it's possible to have a reasonable level of physical safety while driving a car Again, this is not a comparable analogy at all. If you're unable to in no uncertain terms say "this project is going to hurt users" out of fear of getting fired/looking like not a team player, that is not even a "reasonable level" of psychological safety. |
|