|
|
|
|
|
by ShamblingMound
1882 days ago
|
|
This was (1) research with human subjects (2) where the human subjects were deceived, and (3) there was no informed consent! If the IRB approved this as exempt and they had an accurate understanding of the experiment, it makes me question the IRB itself. Whether the researchers were dishonest with the IRB or the IRB approved this as exempt, it's outrageous. |
|
I do recommend participating more in other threads and a little less in this thread, where you're repeating pretty much the same point over and over.