|
|
|
|
|
by eitland
1884 days ago
|
|
It seems you can always just run the AGPL licensed software and as long as you interact with it through the network or the database you won't have to relicense anything. What you cannot do is: 1. change the AGPL software itself and provide it to end users in any form without providing updated sources 2. make a combined product and not provide sources for all of it under AGPL. 3. Also there is nothing to prevent you from releasing sources of your software dual licensed under both MIT and AGPL. |
|
1+2 are plain old GPL. 3 is just a basic consequence of owning all the IP, but it isn't possible to release a patch to an AGPL under MIT.
AGPL has massively enhanced virality, which is the entire point.