Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cblconfederate 1894 days ago
Can't the chairs of state start acting like CEOs of their countries rather than like royals who need to fly 200 people just to have a chat? They can talk on zoom, all we need to know is "chairman of india spoke to chairman of uk and the following things changed:"
3 comments

What makes you think they don‘t? Actual physical visits are to eg finalze deals, when high-bandwidth communication is necessary. And by high-bandwidth I mean body language, spontaneous n-to-n conversations between all participants, etc.
i don't think decisions that affect millions should be based on body language
What should they be based on? Its kind of stupid to ask people to behave like Spock like value maximizing machines.
While I see your point, I find commuting umpteen hours for a 5 minute conversation that could have been over the phone, over email, or over zoom-skype-jitsi rather soul-sucking.

And Spock did have emotions.

> like value maximizing machines.

thats the job of a head of state

More like the Tal Shiar, if we’re using Trek references — politicians don’t try to deny emotions.
they should, it's just a job, not their personal drama
Given the man’s well documented history of pathological dishonesty [0], I suspect that body language is how he was elected.

[0] e.g. https://youtu.be/ZVOV3sU8Ays

It’s somewhat crazy that I can’t tell without clicking whether this is about Modi or Johnson.
Interesting. FWIW, Modi doesn’t have that kind of reputation in the sections of the UK news that I follow.
Yes I assumed you meant Modi as well. Regardless of how I feel about both of them. It could happen any time two “populist” leaders are brought up that way.
In person conversations are to preserve plausible deniability, presuming they are not being recorded. I am only going to say things I want a transcript of over electronic mediums. CEOs do the same thing, and it is partly why being located in certain dense cities is so valuable.
Especially considering international travel is still banned by law for any non-essential purposes, and I can't see how a meeting that could be trivially done on Zoom would be classified as essential.