Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Woung1938 1887 days ago
The most plausible explanation is that the tech is patented to such a degree that producing this kind of solutions is just not economically viable.
3 comments

Always with this excuse, but I really doubt it. There's just a million manufacturers of this or technology similar to this. Many of them have failed and people usually would only notice and care _after_ they failed.
Considering how long ago the OLPC project was, hopefully the patents are running out soon.
Patents aren't the main problem here; the lower refresh rate and resolution mean not many people want it.

Fewer people wanting it means lower economy of scale and higher prices, which means even fewer still.

The most plausible explanation is that it's expensive because there's no economy economy of scale, and that there's no economy of scale because people don't want to pay extra for a worse quality screen even if it has a slightly better battery life.