It did, but perhaps the grounds that made countries and governments make sense no longer apply? After all nation states as we knew them today are a rather new innovation.
You are saying that modern countries are new and out of date?
This is a simple economy of scale. A government can provide stable security - police and military - consistent services, retirement benefits, certification, education, etc.
How a bunch of warring feudal clans are going to be in vogue again is hard to see. I mean, all of this is in medieval history. Technology did not suddenly make people "ready". If anything, it made us worse.
Relatively new, on the scale of human settled history. The Greek had city states and feudal Europe had feudal kingdoms.
I agree that security can probably best be provided at a level of states, but does a kid in the Ghetto really receive a comparative level of protection, service or education as another kid in the US, chosen at random?
And also the flip side of security is that oppression can also best be delivered at the state level. North Koreans would be strictly better of if NK was a bunch of warring states.
This is a simple economy of scale. A government can provide stable security - police and military - consistent services, retirement benefits, certification, education, etc.
How a bunch of warring feudal clans are going to be in vogue again is hard to see. I mean, all of this is in medieval history. Technology did not suddenly make people "ready". If anything, it made us worse.