Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tartoran 1894 days ago
I find it a good thing to name it after someone who discovered something or pioneered branch in the field. Sometimes it makes it confusing but most of the time the name reference makes it very easy to remember as well
1 comments

If that were true, then why don't we do the same thing for programming? We only do that for languages and algorithms (which I'm still not a fan of), but everything else tries to have descriptive names because then it's easier to understand how it fits together with other concepts. If we called for loops "bobs" and while loops "jims", how are you supposed to know how they are related, structurally?
Mathematical concepts are more general and abstract and so a short description is sometimes hard or inconvenient to describe without overlapping dozens of other concepts. Wherever it makes sense there are all sorts of descriptive names : loops, knots and so on