|
|
|
|
|
by mrighele
1896 days ago
|
|
The article is about the improvements since Java 8. In other words the title should be read as "[Java 11/14/etc is so good that] you can't afford to run [i.e., stay on] Java 8" I agree that the title was a poor choice though. |
|
I promise to be more careful when picking up the title next time. I hope that the article's content somehow compensated that ;)