|
|
|
|
|
|
by gnfargbl
1899 days ago
|
|
|
> is very obviously made from a point of bias Why do you believe that? It seems to me that the reputational damage caused by the U of C centre putting out bad slides is going to be stronger than any benefit they might get from being "seen to be a team player" or similar. Skepticism is always good but in this particular case, I do trust that evidence. > there are a number of really nasty adverse reactions that don't throw you in the ICU OK, but you can make the same argument for COVID. It seems to me that the slides are at least comparing apples with apples. |
|
|
If you look at the rates of acute side effects to the vaccines, I forget the exact number but it's at least like 80%. It's insanely high. SARS-2 absolutely does not produce that given the massive proportion of asymptomatic individuals and significant amount of paucisymptomatic individuals