|
|
|
|
|
by kaczordon
1889 days ago
|
|
Ermm, the jnj uses an adenovirus to deliver the plasmid DNA(1). I'm only referring to the jnj/astra here not the mRNA ones. And I think that article I linked represents a real risk it's not like we've tested for this danger before going ahead with a mass vaccination campaign where even rare events can become a real danger. Additional dangers of DNA vaccines include production of anti-DNA antibodies and autoimmune reactions(2). I think we should be communicating these dangers to the public so that healthy individuals at no risk can make a proper benefit-risk decision, instead of just saying "vaccines good" and brushing over concerns. (1) https://coronavirus.medium.com/decoding-johnson-johnsons-cov... (2) https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-62703-110-3... |
|
The article you linked estimates the risk of DNA integration is three orders of magnitude times lower than gene deactivation through regular mutations. I think we're safe.
> Additional dangers of DNA vaccines include production of anti-DNA antibodies and autoimmune reactions
Any documented cases in clinical trials?