|
|
|
|
|
by Mulpze15
1898 days ago
|
|
If you did not need to pay when you need healthcare, if education was free with equal opportunity, and everybody had enough to eat and a half decent place to live, I would entertain discussing this. You could have this today in the US, it exists elsewhere. Yes, it would probably cost a bit more for the wealthiest people. Until then, I believe we should not try to justify inequality based on irrealistic theoretical arguments. I see just a ploy to preserve the current situation by people in a good situation. Because inequality and poverty is all too real. It hurts real people, unfairly. In the US. And it could change. |
|
No, at least in those places you mention, it costs more for the middle class. And I'm not sure it's just "a bit" - the difference in taxes between the US and the multiple European countries I've lived in is quite significant.
It's fine if you believe that's part of a fair social contract. I'm European and I do, mostly - I certainly want everyone to have access to quality education and healthcare. (It's some of the other public expenditure I despise... Public TV in this day and age, seriously?)
At any rate let's not pretend Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Bezos can shoulder everyone's education in the US.