Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by klapatsibalo 1891 days ago
I agree. However, we had to create complex C "standards" for dos and don'ts in order to _try_ to write safe code.

And C is still omnipresent. So there must be some other characteristic of Bash that makes it not fit for this age (or some characteristic of C that makes it irreplaceable, that Bash does not have)

1 comments

> And C is still omnipresent.

And actively being replaced by rust each day because those "standards" are obviously not enough.

And there is some other characteristic of C - its portable.