[kop316]

...are you going to address, you know, the rest of your comment being factually incorrect?

I am saying the rest of your document you cited was riddled with errors that I could show was wrong off hand (with citations!), so any claims you make that I don't know is right, I treat with skepticism.

I'm unconvinced that you have actually looked through the source of the Librem 5, considering you didn't know it supported encryption! Hell, did you look at their product page? You can see that it has a smartcard on their product page! And yet you claimed it doesn't have "hardware backed encryption".

So either you are a) completely unaware of how to do basic research and citations or b) willfully spreading misinformation.

[atat7024]

> ...are you going to address, you know, the rest of your comment being factually incorrect?

Just have elsewhere.

[kop316]

considering doing ctrl + f "atat7024" proves otherwise, you are simply not worth replying to anymore, seeing as how you cannot conduct basic research or you are willing spreading misinformation.

[atat7024]

I don't currently have time to hotlink the absolute latest from security researchers' IRC chats etc direct to your door.

All I can do is point.