Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vmception 1900 days ago
Not if you don't like the established case law and want to argue for a completely different outcome. Which is just me saying the exact same thing a second time. Let's see if we get to a third rehash of this optional preference.
1 comments

You do not want, at the same time, a jurisdiction that leans on well-established case law, but also does whatever the heck it wants because you're arguing for it. Not unless you're in a privileged position to influence the court in a way that anyone coming up against you can't, anyway.
There are a lot of things I don't like about Delaware decisions

I could play this game for the next 300 years before people catch on or fundamentally change anything about the nation state/jurisdiction/case law concept

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes?