Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kaba0 1899 days ago
Well, in js performance it is unfortunately behind in some benchmarks as far as I know. And some major non-standard website refuses to run under firefox, like teams unfortunately (definitely the fault of Microsoft)

So I am an FF user by ideology, but sometimes do use Chromium (basically only to not have to run electron).

2 comments

Being "behind in some benchmarks" is not an argument at all. You're implying that

1. Those test convey any useful information leading to

2. The average user is able to notice the difference in the real world

I think that things that are not js execution time for actual site functionality are much worse for the overall web experience, namely js execution time for ads/trackers and overall latency caused by bad connection quality or bandwidth. The overall experience on firefox with ublock is en par with chrome with ublock for your average mom.

You don’t have to convince me of Firefox being all around better, but I think it is important to note the areas where it could improve.
I am certain that I've used Teams in Firefox? I regularly use other 365 webapps as well with no problems (apart from troubles that are also present in every other browsers).
I think joining a meeting itself is what doesn’t work (for me at least) under linux. I can log in and use other features.
Ah I see. My employer uses teams quite heavily for its other features but we use Zoom for meetings.