|
|
|
|
|
|
by johnday
1894 days ago
|
|
|
> It's true that Wayland is just a protocol but that protocol is also defined significantly by its implementations. A protocol should never, never, ever be defined in any way by its implementations. The entire purpose of a protocol is to abstract away the common interface such that it is entirely implementation-agnostic. Indeed, you might say that a protocol prescribes exactly the intersection of all implementations. |
|
|
That's a better way to put it and that's more what I was getting at.