[vetinari]

> As opposed to basic things (like display drivers, hibernation, bluetooth, fingerprint scanners, etc.) working fine on both.

I have a nice list of issues that contradicts that statement. For example, M1 macs like to kernel panic for some reason.

> But it's on Linux where people usually have to fight/configure/trial-and-error to get basic things working more often than Windows and macOS.

Depends what you are trying to achieve. If you were trying to hackintosh some random ASUS+AMD laptop, your experience would not be nice either. Similarly, when you are trying to use random crap (that's technical term) where nobody ever did any integration with Linux, the experience will be bad (that someone doing the integration is going to be you). If you use either supported machine model (where the machine vendor did all the work), or machine that's very near to reference designs (where the chip vendors did the work), you experience will be much better.