|
|
|
|
|
by devenblake
1892 days ago
|
|
I'm a minor and have contributed to numerous open-source projects (nothing of particular value but contributions nonetheless). Why not just treat them as an adult? If you're interacting with them in a professional manor I can't imagine how their age could be relevant, and minors (I think) can still own and concede intellectual "property" according to US law. |
|
For some reason this made me chuckle. You indeed are a minor :D
The problem OP is facing is not that s/he is unable to treat the contributor as adult. Which probably s/he is. The problem is the law does not treat minors as adults. There are reasons for this. Minors are exploited in all sorts of ways. Infact, interns(even adult ones) are treated badly. Once I was working for a company(a world leader) in the UK. A new intern joined. Next day he goes around everyones desk in the team as starts asking if they would like tea or coffee! And everyone was telling them their preference. He came to me as asked this question. This was new to me. I asked him, is this his assigned task? Who assigned him this responsibility to bring tea/coffee to everyone at thier desk? He looked shocked and confused. I said to him that I would be happy he if rather come to me with a work related problem. He did not say a word and went to the company kitchen and bought everyone else their preferred drink! This is how interns are treated. Think what will happen to minors if there was no law.