Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by adamcstephens 1904 days ago
I missed the source on this and thought it said Reuters, but partway through I had to look back up because the bias was over there top. Only then did I realize it was Reason which explained the clearly one sided writing I had just read. For example there is no evidence presented that shows he remained calm, yet it was clearly stated that he did multiple times. While I have no reason to doubt it, I have no reason to trust it either.
1 comments

I sensed the same one-sidedness in the writing. Fortunately, they link to the recording, which I highly recommend listening to if you're curious about all the nuances that can come through at the time that get missed in summaries.

https://soundcloud.com/user-381804527/microagressions-presen...

The relevant bit starts around 28:40 or so.

Ahh, thanks. I missed that link.