[nitrogen]

without any consequences

This is a pretty big distraction that is often used in these types of discussions. It's a distortion of what people actually want. The "consequences" being advocated are often just the whims of today's favored group. Giving free speech benefits to only one side of the argument is exactly what people are asking for when they ask for "consequences" -- freedom for A, consequences for B.

[justapassenger]

Sure, favored groups will get more benefits. But that’s different from free speech. Free speech doesn’t guarantee equality.