|
|
|
|
|
by catblast01
1904 days ago
|
|
This is really a false/meaningless distinction though. The C++ spec covers the “language” (it’s one of the first sentences), and that includes the standard library. The spec uses the terminology language and library but there is no formal distinction between them other than how they’re organized in the spec. A conformant compiler could implement the entire STL as a built in if it wanted to. There is a formal distinction between hosted and freestanding, but that’s not the same as library/language.
Cf https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/freestanding I really don’t care for pedantry, but when people start correcting others then had better be right. |
|
Else what would be the meaning of core language defects ? http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html