|
|
|
|
|
by protonimitate
1904 days ago
|
|
I really disagree with this point of view. I don't think anyone should feel indebted to their circumstance/employer just because there are others out there without the same opportunities. Is it entitlement? Maybe. But isn't it also entitlement for companies to try to squeeze the maximum amount of productivity out of employees for the least amount of compensation? Why can't they see that there are less fortunate companies that can't afford to bring on the most productive workers? If OP wants a low stakes job to coast to retirement in - more power to them. The only "issue" I see is if OP intentionally deceives their immediate team/coworkers and is off-loading their commitments while reaping the benefits. > It goes completely against the idea of progress and works against any form of entrepreneurial spirit Not everyone cares about these as values. Some people just want to have a decent life and spend time thinking about things other than work. I don't see why they should uphold these values just because others don't have the opportunity to. |
|
A few years ago when the first rumblings of "everyone is an entrepreneur" and "be your own brand" and all that stuff with books I read a book called Life, Inc, by Douglas Rushkoff. It helped me realize that the people who thought that living your life like you are corporation comes from a particular worldview that deifies people like Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and the like. It equates that view of life as the best, nay only, way to live and succeed.
Personally, I love programming, and I love other activities. I tolerate some corporatization of myself for programming because it pays the bills. I would never want to be an entrepreneur or run a company. I hate doing all the other stuff that running a business requires.
Not that love being a wage slave, but that I have better things to do with my life than sell my skills.