|
|
|
|
|
by currymj
1902 days ago
|
|
It's a common defense of the SAT that it gives a fair shot to smart students whose cultural background means they don't know how to play the admissions game. But I think this is not true at hyper-selective institutions, because as you say a perfect SAT score is necessary but not sufficient. A student who has been on the normal, non-advanced educational track, not playing the resume game, and suddenly gets a 1600 SAT, still typically won't have a shot at MIT. What they will get is a bunch of great full scholarships to good, but not hyper-selective elite, universities. |
|