|
|
|
|
|
|
by tom_mellior
1898 days ago
|
|
|
> Calling it "decompilation" is misleading. That term implies that you can get your compiled binary and turn it back into C++. No automated tool exists that allows you to do that The article shows snippets of decompiled C++ code. No, nobody is claiming that it is the "original" code. But it is C++ code derived from the compiled binary. Decompilation. > Instead what we actually do is 'disassembly'. Additionally what we do is disassembly. |
|
|