|
|
|
|
|
by ttt333
1901 days ago
|
|
Why don't we discuss corporate income taxes as effectively a fee for the legal and commercial advantages associated with being a corporate entity in the US? For example a C corporation can tap into highly liquid and well developed capital markets, limit and separate the owners and lenders to a business from management and associated liability beyond their initial investment, and thanks to certain legal decisions like Citizens United, corporations still seem to enjoy what seem to me more like personal rights such as freedom of speech, ability to participate in politics anonymously , and likely more I don't know about. With all the aforementioned advantages, is it any wonder that a huge proportion of firms above a certain size limit are C corporations despite the obvious downside to contend with of double taxation? [1] It seems like the relevant question is the value of those advantages to the tax rate legislated by congress, net of costs related to the right accounting, legal, and lobbying teams. [1]: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44086.pdf (page 7 and 8) |
|