Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hyko 1902 days ago
It's a mechanism designed to reduce economic inequality

Income inequality. Totally different thing; really wealthy people can play all sorts of games with income, so it’s not relevant to them. And that’s the way they like this debate framed: ignore their enormous piles of wealth and instead focus on the earnings distribution of ordinary people.

If anything, it just stops you getting anywhere near to joining their ranks on an honest wage.

1 comments

Really wealthy people are probably not paying much income taxes to begin with
Let me introduce you to the HELOC.

Wealthy people do not take out mortgages. They borrow cash against their existing wealth. They then buy things with that. Then pay back against the loan. Writing it off too (as per tax law). The 'rich' have sold everyone a bill of goods how they are redoing the tax system for 'the people'. When the reality is they are writing a bunch more exemptions for themselves.

You can do the same thing. Many people when they figure it out 'level up'.

> Let me introduce you to the HELOC

Home equity loans are predominantly used by middle income households [0].

The rich can borrow against securities at the call money rate, currently 2% [1]. Much cheaper than borrowing against real estate [2]. The less rich swap it to a fixed rate for added security; the richer take the rate risk. (They likely have natural hedges.) The super rich seek to borrow at or close to the SOFR [3], typically having Treasuries or similar structured products for the purpose. (If they have a business with float, that could be even cheaper than SOFR.)

[0] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.574...

[1] https://www.bankrate.com/rates/interest-rates/call-money.asp...

[2] https://www.bankrate.com/home-equity/heloc-rates/

[3] https://apps.newyorkfed.org/markets/autorates/SOFR

point taken! I like to use the HELOC as it is something most people can do.
That's his point. The income tax is not as effectively redistributive as a wealth tax would be.