[slibhb]

Is is good that fruit is classified this way? Isn't it a truism at this point that large, nice looking fruit tastes worse?

Even if classification is necessary (and pre-dates the EU), should every country use the same classification? Or should they each do their own? If France decides they're tired of using the EU classification system, are they allowed to?

There are real differences of opinion about questions like this and these differences (rather than bare facts) are what's being disputed here.

[alkonaut]

> Is is good that fruit is classified this way?

So long as consumers prefer it, It’s unavoidable I think. It’s also hard to change.

But the thing is, lower grade isn’t wasted or much cheaper, it’s a bit cheaper but not enough so that consumers would choose it. So if a supermarket has 10 kind of apples, not one will be 2nd class. Why? Lots of reasons. Because people believe good looking fruit keeps better or tastes better perhaps. Because consumers buy fruit also as decoration, for example. But the same consumers also buy juice and ketchup and that’s where they buy the 2nd class fruit! We buy most our fruit and veg that way. I want my 1 orange I buy to use for my old fashioned cocktail to be without blemishes. The 10 oranges I buy as orange juice I don’t care how ugly they are.

> Isn't it a truism at this point that large, nice looking fruit tastes worse?

I think it’s pretty common at least that well tasting and slow varieties have more taste but have been displaced by beautiful fast growing varieties. It’s a shame but I’m not sure there is an easy solution to this problem. For cooking veg I’d love to buy ugly and better tasting.

> Even if classification is necessary (and pre-dates the EU), should every country use the same classification? Or should they each do their own? If France decides they're tired of using the EU classification system, are they allowed to?

Why then use the same classification in the whole country? Where there is one market there is one classification system.

This isn’t a classification invented for consumers, this is so someone ordering a ton of apples can compare the price they get from the Spanish grower with that of the Italian one. Without actually seeing the produce. In the consumer end, these classifications are mostly useless. The question is then: could the EU market function and be fair without some of the regulations such as classifications? Perhaps. And these things come and go. For one country to get an exception is difficult. If France wishes to change the classification system they’d probably do better by trying to change it. Again - the classifications aren’t important for French supermarket shoppers, it’s about whether an importer can directly compare French and Spanish produce. If French exporters want to sell on the EU market they’ll probably need to follow those rules.

Could they drop some EU rule where supermarkets don’t need to display these classifications to consumers? That sounds much easier. I’m not sure that’s even a requirement and if it is it seems quite unnecessary.