|
|
|
|
|
by kgwgk
1899 days ago
|
|
I think we agree then: - for a fixed sample size we can find a time large enough that the probability of the sample mean being above $1 is as low as we want - for a fixed time we can find a sample size large enough that the probability of the sample mean being below $1 is as low as we want - when both the sample size and the horizon grow without limit which effect dominates will depend on how we make it happen Adding "almost surely" to "everyone goes bankrupt and will never recover" or "there is a finite time after which no-one ever passes above $0.0000000000000001" is a subtle change but it's enough to allow for someone to go to infinity with infinitesimal probability. This is why the distribution mean can grow exponentially, it wouldn't be possible if the everyone and no-one in those quotes were strictly true. |
|
Just to confirm, I am using 'almost surely' in the technical sense, which means 'with probability 1.'
Consider the following statement:
If you keep flipping a fair coin every day, it is almost sure that after some day you will have gotten a tails.
This is the same 'almost surely' that I am referring to.