Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xiphias2 1898 days ago
Why would the current house owners do that? The renters suffer, who don't have voting rights, so I don't see why this would change in the future.
1 comments

What do you mean "renters don't have voting rights"?
The renters suffering aren’t actual current renters so much as the would-be renters who can’t actually become renters in the City because there are no units available for them to rent.

Those people have no voting rights in the City.

I can't tell if you're serious or not...

How can someone say with a straight face that it's unjust people who don't live in a jurisdiction have no say in how it's run?

> How can someone say with a straight face that it's unjust people who don't live in a jurisdiction have no say in how it's run?

AFAICT, no one said it was unjust that nonresidents don’t vote in city elections. It was raised as a reason the policy was unlikely to be changed at the city level, because the people adversely effected aren’t voters in the city.

How can the thousands of future renters of a new high rise vote before it's been built? The few current home owners have all the power.