|
|
|
|
|
by yyyk
1905 days ago
|
|
>DRM has never won a single battle that I know of. You need to define 'victory' in a proper manner. Businesspeople don't really care if some lone hacker in some forsaken internet forum broke their DRM. They don't need to fulfill the perfect technical victory condition. So long as they've limited the use of the devices for nearly all users for the commercial lifespan of the device*, and (most importantly) so long they think they make more money than without, they've won as far as they're concerned. Their criteria is far more realistic and relevant to the world at large than the technical 'never ever get hacked' criteria. There's a good argument that perfect protection (if it were possible) would actually be counterproductive to the bottom line. * Just look at how general computing has been getting more and more restricted. |
|