|
|
|
|
|
by shados
1912 days ago
|
|
You zone for what you want to build, not what is there already. The later wouldn't make any sense. The arguments generally given are to show that we're preventing building for density, pointing out NIMBYism, etc, but even if we were doing the polar opposite, the same would be true: If you have a town that's all single family, and zoning rules pass that any and all buildings MUST be 3+ stories, then all the existing houses wouldn't be allowed under current zoning laws. The fact that they're not allowed under current zoning rules is irrelevant. The question is only if the new zoning rules are good for what you want to see or not. |
|
In contrast, SFH-only zoning is exclusionary.