|
|
|
|
|
by teraflop
1899 days ago
|
|
The original theoretical justification for why the EmDrive was supposed to work was also wrong. The idea was to use a cavity shaped like a truncated cone, such that the forces on the big end and the small end don't precisely cancel. But this neglects the force on the sloping sides, which (of course) balances everything out. Here's a detailed analysis by Greg Egan showing why the EmDrive would not be theoretically expected to generate any thrust: https://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Cavity/Cavity.html Proponents tried to hand-wave these arguments away and claim that the EmDrive's empirical results were explained by new, unknown physics. |
|