|
|
|
|
|
by sh1989
1907 days ago
|
|
Everything he describes is testing. But it's somewhat cross-purposes talking. When people typically talk about automating the testing, they're talking about taking rote-based manual checks and automating them. Absolutely fine, no complaints from me. But that's not automating "the" testing. It might be automated their testing, and those two things are different. You can easily tell by whether they're doing it to get rid of the testers (cost-saving), or freeing up manual testers to do what they're good at: context-driven exploration of the problem space. |
|
Flaky tests are mostly meaningless. Slow tests are burden.