Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Glavnokoman 1907 days ago
I fail to see any change in her position. In both cases she openly defend the person treated unfairly in her opinion. What is inconsistent here?
2 comments

The inconsistency here is that Leah Rowe stopped the initial boycotting campaign before that campaign was able to make any change, it was pretty clear that the original intention was to refuse cooperation unless the FSF acknowledges and solves the problem in a satisfactory manner. But it never happened, AFAIK, to this day, that ex-employee in question is still highly critical of the FSF on its alleged mishandling of the issue.
The implied tribe.