[JTfor2032]

A nice, well written article over-all. However I would like point out an observation I made that nobody seems to pick up on. The “"big six" are all American corporations that trying to monopolize American media industries, which leads to false sense of freedom of speech among Americans. As you know it will be hard to get this documentary produced and released to an American audience that lies in the middle an information monopolization that I have termed the "media bubble". All attempts to break the media bubble from within the media bubble will encounter a devastating attack from the big six corporations. So far no one has purposed a strategy that incorporates gaining support and using resources from outside the bubble. A place such as Europe, will allow the documentary to be very resistant from corporate attacks. While, Europeans might not be as compelled, to donate their money towards a documentary aimed at stopping a corporate takeover in America, Europe still has plenty of characteristics, which the United States lacks, that would be fruitful for making a documentary.

Ps. the chart, which is displayed in the article, cannot be zoomed in on and is rather hard to understand. However it could just be the fact that I am not very intelligent.

[Chris_Dollar]

JTfor2032: I agree with what you are saying. It is impossible to have accountable governance when most people get their "news" from the television. Television news in the US is unfortunately concentrated among six huge media conglomerates.

The Internet as we know it, is unfortunately increasingly looking like it is going the way of cable television. Especially in the wake of the NBC-Comcast merger. If this progression continues, which it looks like it will... we will continue to have more and more people in the U.S. keep up with the Anthony Weiner and Royal Wedding Stories and less and less people know that the Internet was shut off in Syria.

[JTfor2032]

Is anything similar happening in Europe?

[braindemon]

It's really hard to make comparisons with Europe, because their situation is so different, and also within a very different cultural/historical context as well. Firstly, they don't suffer from a hyper-consumerized, anti-intellectual (shit throwing) Ape culture. So they're typically more immune from Corporate Propoganda. Furthermore, they have state TV stations that are liberal and honest. Our PBS was not allowed to do anything actually relevant or watched, so our PBS was ghettoized to do documentaries about the History of the ice-cream cone on the Eastern Seaboard during the late 19th Century.

[Chris_Dollar]

I agree it is very hard to compare the United States with Europe, but there are many similarities and a ton of cross over in ownership. American media firms that are competitors in the United States are many times joined at the hip in Europe. There is a ton of collusion going on.

Ben Bagdikian, former Berkeley Journalism Dean and author of "Media Monopoly" has spent 30 years painstakingly chronicling these relationships.

These media conglomerates are constantly merging and getting more powerful by the day. They of course have their sights firmly on taking "control" of the Internet (will there always be some dissension...sure on the fringes of society) But those that think that the Internet will always have to be an open medium are naive, remember everyone said the same thing about radio in the 1920s.

One more thing to think about when we compare Europe to the US. One must look at French Pres. Nicolas Sarkozy and his attempts "civilize" the Internet which is really a code for “regulations favorable to big business and the national security state.

Full story here: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/05/france-attem...

The difference is the French citizens on the whole are more engaged (as braindeomon points out) so they haven't put up with Sarkozy's proposals... unlike the American populace who are largely uninformed on what's going on politically (outside of Congressman Weiner's antics).

[braindemon]

I admit I painted an overly simplified, pre-1990's picture. Even the BBC has famously had to adopt a more "American" model of advertisers allowing more inroads by mega-corporations, and they've partnered with several American corporations.

Sarkozy is notorious for his overt racist statements and policies, so he will be no friend to democracy. I just feel sorry for his beautiful, talented wife, because he really is a narcissist.

Right wing Berlusconi built his media empire on trash, titilating television and is famous for his teenage lovers.

However, being ultra-/ far-right wing in Europe is famously understood to be well to the left of Liberal Democrats. Our actual "moderate" right wing would be illegal in Europe, since they had to deal with fascism, so won't countenance anything that vicious.