[red_phone]

For their UniFi line, at least, you don't have to use their cloud controller. You can self-host.

[MobileVet]

Yep, I have my controller running on a Synology 720+ NAS that has zero ‘wide area network’ access. Everything is local to my home.

I am deeply saddened by Ubiquiti’s fall from grace... they were so good.

[DividableMiddle]

Can you go into more detail about your setup? I have 920+ and am in the market for a new router (controller? Still learning the terminology).

[hedora]

The cloud controller is a (surprisingly heavyweight) service that manages a network of unifi devices. It can run on a raspberry pi, or an x86 container / vm.

If I wanted to run it all the time, I’d try putting it in a docker container on my synology.

Instead, I have an sd card for my raspberry pi that has nothing but the controller installed. The main downsides to this are that it is easy to lose the sd card, and that the controller gathers bandwidth/usage/wifi connection reliability stats, but only when it is running. I don’t get those unless I boot up the RPi to diagnose some network issue (this has never been an issue in practice).

One advantage of the RPi setup over a synology container is that it has both a ethernet jack and a wifi adaptor. This is surprisingly helpful when bootstrapping complicated mesh topologies.

[MobileVet]

Yep, I put it in a Docker container on the Synology. Fairly straight forward. I followed a guide like this:

https://lazyadmin.nl/home-network/unifi-controller-on-a-syno...

[katbyte]

I have a UDMpro which self-hosts a controller, thou personally if i knew it couldn't be joined to another controller i'd have gotten something else so i could throw it in docker (which runs on a NUC with the storage off a synology)

[asix66]

Yes. I run the controller on a raspberry pi 4. Local only.

I too am disappointed in UniFi’s direction.

I used to recommend them. I don’t now.

[katbyte]

What do you use/recommend now?

[asix66]

Gosh. I wish I knew. This thread is rife with alternatives, so other's guess is as good as mine. The unifi wifis I have running are still good and work extremely well. So my suggestion is to keep using them, but only if you host the controller software on your own hardware (I'm using RPi 4 as stated) and only if you avoid their cloud solution(s). (This IMO).

I am still looking for alternatives when the time comes to replace mine. Which I'll be forced to replace once/if they completely nerf the self hosted on self hardware options.

[lostlogin]

Is that true on the UDM-Pro?

I couldn’t see an option on setup.

I might try block it from internet and see what happens.

[notwedtm]

Yes, this is true. You can access the Unifi controller on the local internal IP.

[cle]

This is what I do. I host a controller in AWS on an EC2 instance in my account. It works great.

[dijit]

Out of interest, why wouldn't you host it on something like a raspberry pi?

Having your local network depend on an external network makes my old school sysadmin bones tingle for some reason.

[gregmac]

The Ubiquiti controller is not needed for general operation, unless you're using a guest hotspot. Otherwise if it's offline you just lose ability to do configuration and it's data/stats logging.

[julianz]

It's also needed if you want to have any control over SSID's such as enabling/disabling on a schedule, bandwidth limiting and so on.

[thrixton]

Hah, that's a dream world where enabling/disabling SSID's ever worked properly.

They have a good UI, good hardware but the software seems half baked.

Originally with the switch to the "new settings", the schedules were switched between the AP's and the UDM, not sure about a dedicated cloud controller.

Great product, poor QA I think.

[cle]

Laziness? I can just set it up with a couple of clicks and pay almost nothing (it runs on a t2).