[andrius4669]

>RFC 20452, RFC 20463, RFC 20474, RFC 20485

>RFC 68388

what are these numbers, I don't recall RFCs going into 5 digits yet

[maeln]

Yes my bad, it is from a bad copy-paste, you should ignore the last digit.

[colejohnson66]

How do you copy paste something so wrong that it adds a random digit to each number?

[yebyen]

They aren't random at all, they are practically in order. It was probably a footnote reference to the bottom of the source article, with a link to each RFC at the footnote.

[u801e]

The only way I think is that it was a numbered list and they pasted the RFC number before the list number so the list number was actually appended to the RFC number?