|
|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
1912 days ago
|
|
|
Knowing zero about Mint, from the claim and snippet, I assume that “assignments” in a next-block set up bindings for a future state in terms of bindings for the current state. If so, it's not mutation where something could have a reference to the the old counter and have it swapped to the new one. |
|
|