|
|
|
|
|
by tenacious_tuna
1915 days ago
|
|
> What would that be? not OP, but I would presume "the claim" is that (a) there is a God, (b) the church knows which one, and (c) they know what he wants. For comparison, I (atheist) normally state my position as "There is insufficient evidence to conclude there is a God," so any statement about there being any god, or about what influence they should/do have on our lives I treat as a "claim," which requires supporting evidence. |
|
While the whole atheist-agnostic thing is more of a continuum than not, I think the line is whether you believe there is no God or whether you don’t believe there is one. It might seem pedantic but I do think it’s an important distinction.