|
|
|
|
|
by scambier
1911 days ago
|
|
I think it's because of several points that can be interpreted as good or bad: - "relatively new project" > code is fresh and certainly well-organized / maybe lacks stability - "all by one person" > a single vision is a good thing / if that person gives up the project, it's dead - "no other project mentions it" > [no good aspect in that] / no real-world usage If you have any experience in the frontend field, those points are more often bad than good. You don't want to invest time and/or money in that kind of project that has a high chance of being dead within a year. Now, that does not mean that it's a bad project (it looks pretty good actually), but it's just very young. Edit: actually I like this framework very much (but I have a thing for underdogs). It might be ideal to quickly throw POCs or toy projects |
|