|
|
|
|
|
by hyperpallium2
1910 days ago
|
|
Yes. Maybe if MS strategically invested in excellent, free tools, Windows Phone would have the best apps, and win most customers.
"Developers, developers, developers" was right direction, insufficient magnitude. Note that Android chose Java, not for its performance on constrained devices, but for... developers. I really can't see how to tell how plausible this is, that MS Phone could have won, through better long-term strategy, of free dev tools. |
|
They didn't have any market share though, so there wasn't much money to be made making apps for them. I suspect they failed because they launched 2-3 years after Android and iPhone, so the other platforms had accumulated the network effects of an existing user base and app ecosystem that they couldn't catch up to. And they tried hard, IIRC, Microsoft offered to build a Snapchat client for Snap Inc, and to pay them to be allowed to do so, but were denied.