|
|
|
|
|
by mmglr
1910 days ago
|
|
> I always wonder whether contributor names to closed sourced software should always be transparent. Are you implying that the developers that created this back office tool should be liable for the false police reports? If so then then counterpoint based on having made back office apps: the individual contributor (i.e. developer) may either (1) have little to no say in what the app is doing as they are simply implementing the requirements as provided and/or (2) have no knowledge of how it might fail (e.g. when the app is integrated as part of larger business processes) |
|
> Are you implying that the developers that created this back office tool should be liable for the false police reports?
In other fields, having an engineer's signature (or the lack of) means something, legally speaking. Good luck getting any kind of insurance on a new construction that wasn't inspected or built by someone licensed.