|
|
|
|
|
|
by drobilla
5476 days ago
|
|
|
Hilarious, though not strictly correct. There is no guarantee 'sleep n' sleeps for n seconds, or that 'sleep n' wakes up before 'sleep n+1'. Granted, in reality if scheduling is so far off that things like this on the order of seconds become a problem, you've probably got bigger problems... |
|
|