| > Power to gas needs a source of carbon to produce methane.
Only if you want to produce syngas (methane). If you store the resulting hydrogen directly, no carbon source is needed.
That makes storage more location dependent, because the cost-competitive options are salt-caverns, but we are talking about long term storage here... Production of SynGas is more important to replace the current use of ground-pumped methane with CO2 neutral variants. > Also, exist prototype power to gas facilities are ~50% efficient. Even with a 66% efficient combined cycle gas turbine, which is the best we have, net efficiency is ~33%. Which is why there are proposals to go purely via hydrogen and reversible oxidation cells. That way you can get up to about 70-80%. But again, we are talking about long term storage. ALL other options of energy storage are more expensive when you reach the "weekly to monthly" storage timeframe.
At that timeframe, the low efficiency becomes irrelevant, as storage cost ($/kWh) is dominating, and we are talking about renewables anayway. |