|
|
|
|
|
by Nursie
1915 days ago
|
|
> It's often talked and complained about, I don't think "nobody tried so nobody knows" is plausible. Can you find evidence it's been tried? By a major brand?
I'm not sure anyone's making the claim that pocket size would be the number 1 determinant in jeans purchase, fit and style are still going to be important, as are perceptions of quality. This in particular gives me pause about all the perfect-free-market responses here - women are complaining they don't get pockets. Not saying "I don't buy jeans because they have inadequate pockets". I'm not even sure they're saying "I would switch brand because of larger pockets". Just "Why no decent pockets for us?" > What powerful force is there to keep everyone in check Inertia? |
|
That's quite the goal post though. Even if a major brand tried it, it might not be the right cut, color, price, marketing campaign or season.
> Just "Why no decent pockets for us?"
Probably cecause they don't care about decent pockets enough to switch brands or buy a non-major-brand product or start a company to create jeans that have decent products. But I'm sure some have started those companies. And likely found that, despite all those comments, it's not important to the buying decision for most women, and it's much easier to make a living by writing articles about The Jeans Cartel's strategies to oppress women by not allowing larger pockets.